On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 02:33:13PM +0000, Mcnamara, John wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhor...@tuxdriver.com] > > Sent: Monday, December 11, 2017 7:36 PM > > To: dev@dpdk.org > > Cc: tho...@monjalon.net; Mcnamara, John <john.mcnam...@intel.com>; > > Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richard...@intel.com> > > Subject: [PATCHv3 0/4] dpdk: enhance EXPERIMENTAL api tagging > > > > Hey all- > > A few days ago, I was lamenting the fact that, when reviewing > > patches I would frequently complain about ABI changes that were actually > > considered safe because they were part of the EXPERIMENTAL api set. John > > M. asked me then what I might do to improve the situation, and the > > following patch set is a proposal that I've come up with. > > Hi Neil, > > Thanks for this and apologies in advance for making more work for you but > it would be good to have a short section in the Contributors Guide on how > to add/check experimental APIs. I think the information in this cover > letter could be repurposed along with a few code and shell examples. > > Probably as a new high level section in the Contributors Guides: > > http://dpdk.org/doc/guides/contributing/index.html > > Thanks, > > John >
Thats ok, I was actually trying to think of where to add documentation for this thing, but couldnt find a really appropriate place. I'll add that in and repost. Neil
