> -----Original Message----- > From: Nelio Laranjeiro [mailto:nelio.laranje...@6wind.com] > Sent: Monday, December 11, 2017 12:43 PM > To: De Lara Guarch, Pablo <pablo.de.lara.gua...@intel.com> > Cc: Akhil Goyal <akhil.go...@nxp.com>; Doherty, Declan > <declan.dohe...@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org; Gaetan Rivet > <gaetan.ri...@6wind.com>; sta...@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] crypto: fix pedantic compilation errors > > Hi Pablo, > > On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 11:49:39AM +0000, De Lara Guarch, Pablo wrote: > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Nelio Laranjeiro [mailto:nelio.laranje...@6wind.com] > > > Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2017 10:03 AM > > > To: Akhil Goyal <akhil.go...@nxp.com>; Doherty, Declan > > > <declan.dohe...@intel.com> > > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Gaetan Rivet <gaetan.ri...@6wind.com>; De Lara > > > Guarch, Pablo <pablo.de.lara.gua...@intel.com>; sta...@dpdk.org > > > Subject: [PATCH v2 2/3] crypto: fix pedantic compilation errors > > > > > > > ... > > > > > --- a/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_crypto.h > > > +++ b/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_crypto.h > > > @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ struct rte_crypto_op { > > > rte_iova_t phys_addr; > > > /**< physical address of crypto operation */ > > > > > > - RTE_STD_C11 > > > + __extension__ > > > > Hi Nelio, > > > > Since RTE_STD_C11 is basically __extension__ when __STDC_VERSION__ > is > > not defined, Is this forcing __extension__ to be used no matter what? > (even if C11 is not supported). > > Yes >
Right, and are we sure that this is OK? If C11 is supported, do we still want extension? Thanks, Pablo > Thanks, > > -- > Nélio Laranjeiro > 6WIND
