resending after registering with the new email domain ;)
Please, see my comments below.
On 12/01/2017 05:17 PM, Vlad Zolotarov wrote:
On 11/30/2017 09:29 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
remove RTE_ETHDEV_HAS_LRO_SUPPORT flag from header.
Flag seems added with the patch that adds LRO support, and intention
looks like giving a pointer to application that library supports LRO.
Exactly. Removing this flag may make the existing application "think"
that LRO is not supported.
Why do you want to remove it to begin with?
Fixes: 8eecb3295aed ("ixgbe: add LRO support")
Cc:vl...@cloudius-systems.com
Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit<ferruh.yi...@intel.com>
---
lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h
index 341c2d624..e620c3706 100644
--- a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h
+++ b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h
@@ -172,9 +172,6 @@ extern "C" {
#include <stdint.h>
-/* Use this macro to check if LRO API is supported */
-#define RTE_ETHDEV_HAS_LRO_SUPPORT
-
#include <rte_log.h>
#include <rte_interrupts.h>
#include <rte_dev.h>
