On 11/27/2017 10:58 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
On 11/16/2017 12:04 AM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
From: Mark Spender <mspen...@solarflare.com>
What has been fixed here?
If you can provide more details I can amend the commit later.
EFSYS_PROBE1 takes one typed value (in addition to the probe name),
whereas EFSYS_PROBE has just the probe name.
Which to use is determined by the probe name – “fail1” probes are
expected to include the function result.
Thanks,
Andrew.
Fixes: 05fce2ce8451 ("net/sfc/base: import libefx licensing")
Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Spender <mspen...@solarflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybche...@solarflare.com>
---
drivers/net/sfc/base/efx_lic.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/base/efx_lic.c b/drivers/net/sfc/base/efx_lic.c
index de25c5c..cfff51a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/sfc/base/efx_lic.c
+++ b/drivers/net/sfc/base/efx_lic.c
@@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ efx_lic_v1v2_find_key(
return (found);
fail1:
- EFSYS_PROBE(fail1);
+ EFSYS_PROBE1(fail1, boolean_t, B_FALSE);
return (B_FALSE);
}
@@ -540,7 +540,7 @@ efx_lic_v1v2_validate_key(
fail2:
EFSYS_PROBE(fail2);
fail1:
- EFSYS_PROBE(fail1);
+ EFSYS_PROBE1(fail1, boolean_t, B_FALSE);
return (B_FALSE);
}
@@ -1158,7 +1158,7 @@ efx_lic_v3_validate_key(
fail2:
EFSYS_PROBE(fail2);
fail1:
- EFSYS_PROBE(fail1);
+ EFSYS_PROBE1(fail1, boolean_t, B_FALSE);
return (B_FALSE);
}