Hi Hanon,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Hanoh Haim
> Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2017 8:36 AM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Hanoh Haim <hh...@cisco.com>
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mbuf: cleanup rte_pktmbuf_lastseg(), fix atomic 
> usage
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hanoh Haim <hh...@cisco.com>
> ---
>  lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h | 27 +++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
> index 7e326bb..ab110f8 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
> @@ -1159,6 +1159,15 @@ static inline void rte_pktmbuf_reset(struct rte_mbuf 
> *m)
>       __rte_mbuf_sanity_check(m, 1);
>  }
> 
> +
> +static __rte_always_inline void rte_pktmbuf_reset_before_free(struct 
> rte_mbuf *m)
> +{
> +     if (m->next != NULL) {
> +             m->next = NULL;
> +             m->nb_segs = 1;
> +     }
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * Allocate a new mbuf from a mempool.
>   *
> @@ -1323,8 +1332,7 @@ static inline void rte_pktmbuf_detach(struct rte_mbuf 
> *m)
>       m->ol_flags = 0;
> 
>       if (rte_mbuf_refcnt_update(md, -1) == 0) {
> -             md->next = NULL;
> -             md->nb_segs = 1;
> +             rte_pktmbuf_reset_before_free(md);
>               rte_mbuf_refcnt_set(md, 1);
>               rte_mbuf_raw_free(md);
>       }
> @@ -1354,25 +1362,16 @@ rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg(struct rte_mbuf *m)
>               if (RTE_MBUF_INDIRECT(m))
>                       rte_pktmbuf_detach(m);
> 
> -             if (m->next != NULL) {
> -                     m->next = NULL;
> -                     m->nb_segs = 1;
> -             }
> -
> +             rte_pktmbuf_reset_before_free(m);
>               return m;
> 
> -       } else if (rte_atomic16_add_return(&m->refcnt_atomic, -1) == 0) {
> -
> +     } else if (rte_mbuf_refcnt_update(m, -1) == 0) {

That would cause extra read; cmp (and possible slowdown) for atomic refcnt.
If that really need to be fixed - probably we need to introduce a new function
that would do update without trying to read refctn first - 
rte_mbuf_refcnt_update_blind() or so.
Konstantin


> 
>               if (RTE_MBUF_INDIRECT(m))
>                       rte_pktmbuf_detach(m);
> 
> -             if (m->next != NULL) {
> -                     m->next = NULL;
> -                     m->nb_segs = 1;
> -             }
> +             rte_pktmbuf_reset_before_free(m);
>               rte_mbuf_refcnt_set(m, 1);
> -
>               return m;
>       }
>       return NULL;
> --
> 2.9.3

Reply via email to