On 11/3/2017 12:24 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 03/11/2017 20:18, Mody, Rasesh: >> From: Ferruh Yigit [mailto:ferruh.yi...@intel.com] >>> On 11/2/2017 11:45 AM, Mody, Rasesh wrote: >>>> From: Ferruh Yigit [mailto:ferruh.yi...@intel.com] >>>>> On 11/2/2017 10:34 AM, Mody, Rasesh wrote: >>>> We are ok as we have at least some way to disable the reset, please send a >>> patch. >>> >>> Sent http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/31143/, can you please test? >> >> The testing of BNX2X looks OK with this patch. However, the solution has >> following drawbacks: >> - an application will need to be recompiled to have the igb_uio kernel >> module rebuilt to support bnx2x devices >> - this will break pre-compiled solutions that are provided with an OS such >> as RHOSP or as part of a pre-compiled VNF >> >> We can live with this temporary solution for now. In the long term, we may >> have to revisit this. >> We are also looking at why bnx2x FLR is taking this long. > > Yes, I think the long term solution should be to fix your PMD > or your firmware. > Please keep us posted when you find the root cause with your device. > Thanks
Lee Roberts suggested doing device specific action instead of build time option. I send following: http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/31168/ What do you think about this approach? Meanwhile I will send a more proper patch to discuss on. Thanks, ferruh
