> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Mrzyglod
> Sent: Friday, October 27, 2017 6:24 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Mrzyglod, DanielX T <danielx.t.mrzyg...@intel.com>; Liang, Cunming
> <cunming.li...@intel.com>; sta...@dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] test/pmd_perf: fix for segmentation fault
> 
> Error can be reproduce if we run pmd_perf_autotest with more then
> one device in such way:
> RTE>>set_rxtx_sc poll_before_xmit
> RTE>>pmd_perf_autotest
> 
> if first burst was value less than MAX_PKT_BURST in the end we overwrite
> pkts_burst table for rx which was supposed for another interface.
> 
> Fixes: 002ade70e933 ("app/test: measure cycles per packet in Rx/Tx")
> Cc: cunming.li...@intel.com
> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Mrzyglod <danielx.t.mrzyg...@intel.com>
> ---
>  test/test/test_pmd_perf.c | 15 +++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/test/test/test_pmd_perf.c b/test/test/test_pmd_perf.c
> index a3e29ed..255f260 100644
> --- a/test/test/test_pmd_perf.c
> +++ b/test/test/test_pmd_perf.c
> @@ -572,6 +572,7 @@ poll_burst(void *args)
>       unsigned i, portid, nb_rx = 0;
>       uint64_t total;
>       uint64_t timeout = MAX_IDLE;
> +     int num[RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS];
> 
>       lcore_id = rte_lcore_id();
>       conf = &lcore_conf[lcore_id];
> @@ -591,6 +592,7 @@ poll_burst(void *args)
>       for (i = 0; i < conf->nb_ports; i++) {
>               portid = conf->portlist[i];
>               next[portid] = i * pkt_per_port;
> +             num[portid] = pkt_per_port;
>       }
> 
>       while (!rte_atomic64_read(&start))
> @@ -601,8 +603,8 @@ poll_burst(void *args)
>               for (i = 0; i < conf->nb_ports; i++) {
>                       portid = conf->portlist[i];
>                       nb_rx = rte_eth_rx_burst(portid, 0,
> -                                              &pkts_burst[next[portid]],
> -                                              MAX_PKT_BURST);
> +                                     &pkts_burst[next[portid]],
> +                                     RTE_MIN(MAX_PKT_BURST,
> num[portid]));
>                       if (unlikely(nb_rx == 0)) {
>                               timeout--;
>                               if (unlikely(timeout == 0))
> @@ -610,6 +612,7 @@ poll_burst(void *args)
>                               continue;
>                       }
>                       next[portid] += nb_rx;
> +                     num[portid] -= nb_rx;
>                       total -= nb_rx;
>               }
>       }
> @@ -618,7 +621,6 @@ poll_burst(void *args)
> 
>       printf("%"PRIu64" packets lost, IDLE %"PRIu64" times\n",
>              total, MAX_IDLE - timeout);
> -
>       /* clean up */
>       total = pkt_per_port * conf->nb_ports - total;
>       for (i = 0; i < total; i++)
> @@ -644,7 +646,7 @@ exec_burst(uint32_t flags, int lcore)
>       conf = &lcore_conf[lcore];
> 
>       pkt_per_port = MAX_TRAFFIC_BURST;
> -     num = pkt_per_port;
> +     num = pkt_per_port * conf->nb_ports;
> 
>       rte_atomic64_init(&start);
> 
> @@ -661,11 +663,12 @@ exec_burst(uint32_t flags, int lcore)
>               nb_tx = RTE_MIN(MAX_PKT_BURST, num);
>               for (i = 0; i < conf->nb_ports; i++) {
>                       portid = conf->portlist[i];
> -                     rte_eth_tx_burst(portid, 0,
> +                     nb_tx = rte_eth_tx_burst(portid, 0,
>                                        &tx_burst[idx], nb_tx);
>                       idx += nb_tx;
> +                     num -= nb_tx;
>               }
> -             num -= nb_tx;
> +
>       }
> 
>       sleep(5);
> --
> 2.7.4

Acked-by: Michal Jastrzebski <michalx.k.jastrzeb...@intel.com>

Reply via email to