> -----Original Message----- > From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of De Lara Guarch, > Pablo > Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2017 3:33 PM > To: Jan Blunck <jblu...@infradead.org>; dev@dpdk.org > Cc: Doherty, Declan <declan.dohe...@intel.com> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] cryptodev vdev changes for 17.11- > rc1 > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jan Blunck [mailto:jblu...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Jan Blunck > > Sent: Friday, October 6, 2017 9:40 AM > > To: dev@dpdk.org > > Cc: Doherty, Declan <declan.dohe...@intel.com>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo > > <pablo.de.lara.gua...@intel.com> > > Subject: [PATCH v3 0/4] cryptodev vdev changes for 17.11-rc1 > > > > This series is a preparation to move the vdev bus out of librte_eal. > > For that the newly added cryptodev vdev functions need to change > > signature to not require the rte_vdev.h header. > > > > Changes since v1: > > - move params parsing into new header > > - make rte_cryptodev_vdev_pmd_init() static inline > > > > Changes since v2: > > - fix bisect compile errors > > - workaround check-git-log.sh stupidity > > > > Jan Blunck (4): > > cryptodev: remove obsolete include > > cryptodev: move initialization > > cryptodev: rework dependency on vdev header > > cryptodev: move parameter parsing to its own header > > > > lib/librte_cryptodev/Makefile | 1 + > > lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c | 3 + > > lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.h | 1 - > > lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev_pmd.c | 37 +--------- > > lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev_vdev.h | 71 ++++++++----------- > > lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev_vdev_params.h | 89 > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev_version.map | 1 - > > 7 files changed, 122 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-) create mode > > 100644 lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev_vdev_params.h > > > > -- > > 2.13.2 > > Hi Jan, > > Declan has submitted a patchset that drops all vdev/PCI code from > cryptodev, so it superseds your two last patches. > > Therefore, I will drop them and get the first two. The end goal should be the > same, Anyway. > > Thanks, > Pablo
Patch 1 and 2 applied to dpdk-next-crypto. Thanks, Pablo
