On 10/19/2017 3:00 PM, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:


+
+/**
+ * Security context for crypto/eth devices
+ *
+ * Security instance for each driver to register security operations.
+ * The application can get the security context from the crypto/eth device id
+ * using the APIs rte_cryptodev_get_sec_ctx()/rte_eth_dev_get_sec_ctx()
+ * This structure is used to identify the device(crypto/eth) for which the
+ * security operations need to be performed.
+ */
+struct rte_security_ctx {
+       enum {
+               RTE_SECURITY_INSTANCE_INVALID,
+               /**< Security context is invalid */
+               RTE_SECURITY_INSTANCE_VALID
+               /**< Security context is valid */
+       } state;

As a nit - why do you need state now?
As I understand if device doesn't have its security context setup properly,
then rte_eth_dev_get_sec_ctx() would just return 0.
Konstantin

Ok would remove it in v5.


+       /**< Current state of security context */
+       void *device;
+       /**< Crypto/ethernet device attached */
+       struct rte_security_ops *ops;
+       /**< Pointer to security ops for the device */
+       uint16_t sess_cnt;
+       /**< Number of sessions attached to this context */
+};


Reply via email to