> On Oct 11, 2017, at 4:36 AM, Olivier MATZ <olivier.m...@6wind.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > The next techboard meeting will happen on IRC #dpdk-board, at 3pm UTC, > this friday 13th of october. > > The agenda is updated here: > https://annuel.framapad.org/p/r.0c3cc4d1e011214183872a98f6b5c7db > > > 1) ABI stability: > - one LTS per year > - 17.11 to be a LTS > - every new API has the "experimental" tag > - 3 Acks are needed for deprecation and they should come from different > companies > reference: http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-October/077937.html > reference: http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-October/077935.html
I assume the person or company that pushes the notice can be one of the ACKs is this correct? Also does the ACK need to come from a person working for a company or can this person be an independent developer? Maybe a very minor point, but someone that is working for a company could Ack independent of the company if so stated. Just be careful how you word the requirement, something like ‘Only one Ack per company or independent developer’ > > 2) update on license discussion concerning the optimized version of 64bit > division > code from libdivide > - any feedback from governing board? > > 3) update on IPSec offload (rte_security) > - the conclusion on this topic was to post concerns/proposals on dpdk-dev > - is there still something expected from techboard? > > Olivier Regards, Keith
