Thanks Zhiyong, Should I correct this patch and resend to dpdk or is it just a suggestion for future?
Regards, Kuba >-----Original Message----- >From: Yang, Zhiyong >Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2017 08:56 >To: Kozak, KubaX <kubax.ko...@intel.com>; Ananyev, Konstantin ><konstantin.anan...@intel.com> >Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Kozak, KubaX <kubax.ko...@intel.com>; sta...@dpdk.org >Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] l3fwd-acl: fix unchecked return value > >Hi，kubax, > >When you form the patch , you should add v2 and changes in v2. >Besides that, please be free to add >Acked-by: zhiyong yang<zhiyong.y...@intel.com> > >Thanks >Zhiyong > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Kuba Kozak >> Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2017 7:48 PM >> To: Ananyev, Konstantin <konstantin.anan...@intel.com> >> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Kozak, KubaX <kubax.ko...@intel.com>; sta...@dpdk.org >> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] l3fwd-acl: fix unchecked return value >> >> Add return value check and error handling for fseek call. >> >> Coverity issue: 143435 >> Fixes: 361b2e9559fc ("acl: new sample l3fwd-acl") >> Cc: konstantin.anan...@intel.com >> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org >> >> Signed-off-by: Kuba Kozak <kubax.ko...@intel.com> >> Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.anan...@intel.com> >> ---
