Hi Ferruh, On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 01:26:17AM +0100, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 9/11/2017 4:13 PM, Olivier Matz wrote: > > In developer mode (RTE_DEVEL_BUILD=y) where -Werror is passed in the > > CFLAGS, the compilation fails with gcc-6.3.0 and EXTRA_CFLAGS=-Og. Some > > errors are real bugs (but not critical), while some are false positives > > (gcc bugs?). > > > > The solution often consists in initializing a local variable to > > ensure the compiler won't complain. > > > > The patchset contains all the fixes needed to properly compile with -Og. > > Feedback is welcome to decide if: > > 1/ we include all of them, even if some are workarounds for > > gcc bugs > > 2/ we only include the real fixes, without fixing the compilation with > > -Og. > > > > > > Olivier Matz (10): > > net/bnxt: fix compilation with -Og > > net/qede: fix compilation with -Og > > net/virtio: fix compilation with -Og > > net/i40e: fix compilation with -Og > > uio: fix compilation with -Og > > cmdline: fix compilation with -Og > > metrics: fix compilation with -Og > > lpm6: fix compilation with -Og > > app/test-crypto-perf: fix memory leak > > app/test-crypto-perf: fix compilation with -Og > > Series applied to dpdk-next-net/master, thanks. > > Except 3/10, 4/10, 8/10. Normally we don't get partial sets, that makes > life harder for everyone, but since mentioned ones requires some more > input I didn't want to make rest wait.
Thanks > When those three concluded would you mind sending another set for them? Sure, will do as soon as we have the feedback Olivier
