Hi Cristian,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dumitrescu, Cristian
> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 1:21 PM
> To: Singh, Jasvinder <jasvinder.si...@intel.com>; Iremonger, Bernard
> <bernard.iremon...@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org; Yigit, Ferruh
> <ferruh.yi...@intel.com>; Ananyev, Konstantin
> <konstantin.anan...@intel.com>; adrien.mazarg...@6wind.com
> Cc: Iremonger, Bernard <bernard.iremon...@intel.com>; sta...@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/6] librte_table: fix acl entry add and
> delete functions
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Singh, Jasvinder
> > Sent: Monday, September 18, 2017 4:30 PM
> > To: Iremonger, Bernard <bernard.iremon...@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org;
> > Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yi...@intel.com>; Ananyev, Konstantin
> > <konstantin.anan...@intel.com>; Dumitrescu, Cristian
> > <cristian.dumitre...@intel.com>; adrien.mazarg...@6wind.com
> > Cc: Iremonger, Bernard <bernard.iremon...@intel.com>;
> sta...@dpdk.org
> > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/6] librte_table: fix acl entry add
> > and delete functions
> >
> > Hi Bernard,
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > > --- a/lib/librte_table/rte_table_acl.c
> > > +++ b/lib/librte_table/rte_table_acl.c
> > > @@ -316,8 +316,7 @@ struct rte_table_acl {
> > > if (status == 0) {
> > > *key_found = 1;
> > > *entry_ptr = &acl->memory[i * acl->entry_size];
> > > - memcpy(*entry_ptr, entry, acl->entry_size);
> > > -
> > > + memcpy(entry, *entry_ptr, acl->entry_size);
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > > }
> >
> > In this case, table entry which is being added already presents in the
> > table.
> > So, first the pointer to that entry from the memory[] that stores the
> > pipeline table data(struct rte_pipeline_table_entry) associated with
> > key is retrieved and the changes (action and metadara) are stored in
> > the internal table pointed by action_table. So, above fix doesn't seem
> correct.
> >
> > > @@ -353,8 +352,8 @@ struct rte_table_acl {
> > > rte_acl_free(acl->ctx);
> > > acl->ctx = ctx;
> > > *key_found = 0;
> > > - *entry_ptr = &acl->memory[free_pos * acl->entry_size];
> > > - memcpy(*entry_ptr, entry, acl->entry_size);
> > > + *entry_ptr = &acl->acl_rule_memory[free_pos * acl->entry_size];
> > > + memcpy(entry, *entry_ptr, acl->entry_size);
> > >
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > > @@ -435,7 +434,7 @@ struct rte_table_acl {
> > > acl->ctx = ctx;
> > > *key_found = 1;
> > > if (entry != NULL)
> > > - memcpy(entry, &acl->memory[pos * acl->entry_size],
> > > + memcpy(entry, &acl->acl_rule_memory[pos * acl-
> > > >entry_size],
> > > acl->entry_size);
> >
> >
> > Above fixes also seems not correct. As per documentation, *entry_ptr
> > is intended to store the handle to the pipeline table entry containing
> > the data associated with the current key instead of pointing to memory
> > used to store the acl rules, etc. Please refer rte_table_acl_create()
> > where memory is initialized and organized to stores different types of
> > internal tables (pointed by action_table, acl_rule_list and
> acl_rule_memory).
>
> NACK
>
> Fully agree with Jasvinder.
>
> Existing code is correct, proposed code changes are wrong.
I will drop this patch and send a v6 patchset.
Regards,
Bernard.
