-----Original Message-----
From: Tan, Jianfeng
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 2:56 AM
To: Basierski, SebastianX <sebastianx.basier...@intel.com>; skh...@vmware.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH] pmd_virtio: Unchecked return value from library
Hi,
Thank you for those fixes.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Basierski, SebastianX
> Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2017 7:47 PM
> To: skh...@vmware.com
> Cc: Basierski, SebastianX; Tan, Jianfeng; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: [PATCH] pmd_virtio: Unchecked return value from library
>
> Check return value from library in order to prevent potential fail.
>
> Coverity issue: 143439
>
> Fixes: ef53b6030039 ("net/virtio-user: support LSC")
> Cc: jianfeng....@intel.com
> cc: dev@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: SebastianX Basierski <sebastianx.basier...@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user_ethdev.c | 10 ++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user_ethdev.c
> b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user_ethdev.c
> index c961444..16aa350 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user_ethdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user_ethdev.c
> @@ -86,7 +86,10 @@ virtio_user_read_dev_config(struct virtio_hw *hw,
> size_t offset,
> int flags;
>
> flags = fcntl(dev->vhostfd, F_GETFL);
> - fcntl(dev->vhostfd, F_SETFL, flags | O_NONBLOCK);
> + if (fcntl(dev->vhostfd, F_SETFL,
> + flags | O_NONBLOCK) == -1)
> + return;
Actually, even it fails, I still prefer to continue instead of "return" here.
Maybe, we can report an error message here.
Thanks,
Jianfeng
Hi Jianfeng,
I'like to continue with the task.
So please let me know if You are certain with Your option:
continue instead of return (and add error report), despite possibility of
returning error from fcntl.
Regards,
Sebastian Basierski
