On 9/18/2017 9:45 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
18/09/2017 16:50, Ferruh Yigit:
On 9/9/2017 12:20 PM, Shreyansh Jain wrote:
FMan or Frame Manager, inspects traffic, splits it into queueson ingress.
It is also responsible for directing traffic on queues on egress.
This patch introduces FMan configurational interfaces. This layer is
used by Bus driver for configuring the hardware block.
Signed-off-by: Geoff Thorpe <geoff.tho...@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agra...@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain <shreyansh.j...@nxp.com>
<...>
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/bus/dpaa/base/fman/fman.c
@@ -0,0 +1,611 @@
+/*-
+ * This file is provided under a dual BSD/GPLv2 license. When using or
+ * redistributing this file, you may do so under either license.
Another set of dual licensed files.
Shreyansh, Hemant, Thomas,
Who should approve/check licensing?
Hemant is currently handling such issues with the Linux Foundation
and the Governing Board.
We already have some dual licensed files.
Some of them are explicitly referenced in the DPDK charter:
http://dpdk.org/about/charter#ip
I think we must ask the Governing Board to allow dual BSD/GPL
for any file.
I am working with GB to seek guidance on non-standard license code in DPDK.
Standard Dual licensed code (GPL + BSD) is generally Legally OK. I am
checking whether these files should be explicitly listed or not.
Many of the DPDK files in user space (which also exist in kernel) are
dual licensed.
As a outcome of these discussions, we are hoping that techboard will be
publishing the Licensing Guidelines.
