> On Sep 12, 2017, at 8:24 AM, Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richard...@intel.com> > wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 02:21:22PM +0100, Wiles, Keith wrote: >> >>> On Sep 12, 2017, at 5:37 AM, Bruce Richardson <bruce.richard...@intel.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> V2 changes: >>> * fixed copyright notices, updated 2016 to 2017 >>> * removed dependency on kconfig file in kernel build tree >>> * marked pmdinfogen as a "native" binary, in preparation for future cross- >>> compilation work >>> * added in additional warning flags for compatibility with existing system >>> —— >> >> >>> Once reviewed and tested a bit, I hope to apply this set - or a new >>> revision of it - to the build-next tree, to serve as a baseline for others >>> to use and to add the missing functionality to. >> >> I would really like to see these patches in a build-next tree as it is much >> easier to work with and help with changes then patches on the master. >> >> When can we have a build-next tree created? >> > Tree already exists. I'm just waiting on a bit more review and ideally > an ack before I apply this set there.
Not sure what you are waiting for as an ack is not going to make much of a difference IMO :-) > > http://dpdk.org/browse/draft/dpdk-next-build/ > > /Bruce Regards, Keith
