Link speed is not advertised in old firmwares. However, it is safe
to remove the check because reading NFP_NET_CFG_STS returns 0 in
those cases.

Signed-off-by: Alejandro Lucero <alejandro.luc...@netronome.com>
---
 drivers/net/nfp/nfp_net.c | 13 +++----------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/nfp/nfp_net.c b/drivers/net/nfp/nfp_net.c
index 2c288c2..09854a2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/nfp/nfp_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/nfp/nfp_net.c
@@ -988,17 +988,10 @@ enum nfp_qcp_ptr {
        nn_link_status = (nn_link_status >> NFP_NET_CFG_STS_LINK_RATE_SHIFT) &
                         NFP_NET_CFG_STS_LINK_RATE_MASK;
 
-       if ((NFD_CFG_MAJOR_VERSION_of(hw->ver) < 4) ||
-           ((NFD_CFG_MINOR_VERSION_of(hw->ver) == 4) &&
-           (NFD_CFG_MINOR_VERSION_of(hw->ver) == 0)))
-               /* We really do not know the speed wil old firmware */
+       if (nn_link_status >= RTE_DIM(ls_to_ethtool))
                link.link_speed = ETH_SPEED_NUM_NONE;
-       else {
-               if (nn_link_status >= RTE_DIM(ls_to_ethtool))
-                       link.link_speed = ETH_SPEED_NUM_NONE;
-               else
-                       link.link_speed = ls_to_ethtool[nn_link_status];
-       }
+       else
+               link.link_speed = ls_to_ethtool[nn_link_status];
 
        if (old.link_status != link.link_status) {
                nfp_net_dev_atomic_write_link_status(dev, &link);
-- 
1.9.1

Reply via email to