Hi Raslan,

Redoing the review with the remarks from Thomas in mind.

On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 05:37:04PM +0300, Raslan Darawsheh wrote:
> Added hotplug in testpmd, to be able to test hotplug function
> in the PMD's.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Raslan Darawsheh <rasl...@mellanox.com>
> ---
>  app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  app/test-pmd/testpmd.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>  app/test-pmd/testpmd.h |  1 +
>  3 files changed, 63 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> index cd8c358..b32a368 100644
> --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> @@ -716,6 +716,9 @@ static void cmd_help_long_parsed(void *parsed_result,
>                       "port config (port_id|all) l2-tunnel E-tag"
>                       " (enable|disable)\n"
>                       "    Enable/disable the E-tag support.\n\n"
> +
> +                     " device remove (device)\n"

I think (device) might be hard to understand for a user.
Maybe (device name)?

> +                     "    Remove a device"

Here it should be:

+                       "    Remove a device.\n\n"

>               );
>       }
>  
> @@ -1125,6 +1128,46 @@ cmdline_parse_inst_t cmd_operate_detach_port = {
>       },
>  };
>  
> +/* *** Remove a specified device *** */
> +struct cmd_operate_device_remove_result {
> +     cmdline_fixed_string_t device;
> +     cmdline_fixed_string_t keyword;
> +     cmdline_fixed_string_t identifier;
> +};
> +
> +static void cmd_operate_device_remove_parsed(void *parsed_result,
> +                                __attribute__((unused)) struct cmdline *cl,
> +                                __attribute__((unused)) void *data)
> +{
> +     struct cmd_operate_device_remove_result *res = parsed_result;
> +     if (!strcmp(res->keyword, "remove"))
> +             device_remove((char *) res->identifier);
> +     else
> +             printf("Unknown parameter\n");
> +}
> +
> +cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_operate_device_remove_device =
> +     TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_operate_device_remove_result,
> +                     device, "device");
> +cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_operate_device_remove_keyword =
> +     TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_operate_device_remove_result,
> +                     keyword, "remove");
> +cmdline_parse_token_string_t cmd_operate_device_remove_identifier =
> +     TOKEN_STRING_INITIALIZER(struct cmd_operate_device_remove_result,
> +                     identifier, NULL);
> +
> +cmdline_parse_inst_t cmd_operate_device_remove = {
> +     .f = cmd_operate_device_remove_parsed,
> +     .data = NULL,
> +     .help_str = "device remove <device>: (device)",
> +     .tokens = {
> +             (void *)&cmd_operate_device_remove_device,
> +             (void *)&cmd_operate_device_remove_keyword,
> +             (void *)&cmd_operate_device_remove_identifier,

I know you have to follow the conventions set for this file and these
names are correct. But I have to say: they are horrible.

> +             NULL,
> +     },
> +};
> +
>  /* *** configure speed for all ports *** */
>  struct cmd_config_speed_all {
>       cmdline_fixed_string_t port;
> @@ -14276,6 +14319,7 @@ cmdline_parse_ctx_t main_ctx[] = {
>       (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_operate_specific_port,
>       (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_operate_attach_port,
>       (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_operate_detach_port,
> +     (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_operate_device_remove,
>       (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_config_speed_all,
>       (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_config_speed_specific,
>       (cmdline_parse_inst_t *)&cmd_config_rx_tx,
> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
> index 7d40139..a2e8526 100644
> --- a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
> +++ b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
> @@ -1742,6 +1742,24 @@ detach_port(uint8_t port_id)
>  }
>  
>  void
> +device_remove(char *device) {

device is not descriptive enough. I think "devname" would be better.

> +     struct rte_devargs devargs;
> +
> +     if (device == NULL) {
> +             printf("Invalid parameters are specified\n");
> +             return;
> +     }

No need to check for this. If device is NULL, something went very wrong.
Having a hard segfault in this case will stop anyone in their tracks and
force the bug to be investigated.

And it has less LOCs.

> +
> +     rte_eal_devargs_parse(device, &devargs);
> +

After some thinking, I think using the devargs_parse utility is the
simplest and will allow the command to follow future evolutions without
having to change anything here.

> +     if (rte_eal_hotplug_remove(devargs.bus->name, devargs.name)) {
> +             printf("Fail to remove device\n");
> +             return;
> +     }
> +     printf("Device removed successfully\n");
> +}
> +
> +void
>  pmd_test_exit(void)
>  {
>       portid_t pt_id;
> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.h b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.h
> index c9d7739..0780f55 100644
> --- a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.h
> +++ b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.h
> @@ -612,6 +612,7 @@ void stop_port(portid_t pid);
>  void close_port(portid_t pid);
>  void attach_port(char *identifier);
>  void detach_port(uint8_t port_id);
> +void device_remove(char *device);
>  int all_ports_stopped(void);
>  int port_is_started(portid_t port_id);
>  void pmd_test_exit(void);
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 

-- 
Gaëtan Rivet
6WIND

Reply via email to