On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 07:10:46PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > Printing the number of scanned devices should be a debug log, > not an error. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net> > --- > lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal_pci.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal_pci.c > b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal_pci.c > index e321461d8..9335247d8 100644 > --- a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal_pci.c > +++ b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal_pci.c > @@ -396,7 +396,7 @@ rte_pci_scan(void) > > close(fd); > > - RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "PCI scan found %u devices\n", dev_count); > + RTE_LOG(DEBUG, EAL, "PCI scan found %u devices\n", dev_count); > return 0; > would have gone for INFO level myself, but DEBUG works too - it's definitely not an error. The commit title also reads a bit strange to me. How about e.g.: "pci: log fix level of PCI scan summary message on BSD"
Otherwise: Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richard...@intel.com>