The PCI memory resources in the secondary process should be in
the exact same location as the primary process. Otherwise
there is a risk of a stray pointer.
Not sure if this is right, but it looks like a potential
problem.
---
lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_pci_uio.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_pci_uio.c
b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_pci_uio.c
index 367a6816dcb8..2156b1a436c4 100644
--- a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_pci_uio.c
+++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_pci_uio.c
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ pci_uio_map_secondary(struct rte_pci_device *dev)
void *mapaddr = pci_map_resource(uio_res->maps[i].addr,
fd, (off_t)uio_res->maps[i].offset,
- (size_t)uio_res->maps[i].size, 0);
+ (size_t)uio_res->maps[i].size,
MAP_FIXED);
/* fd is not needed in slave process, close it */
close(fd);
if (mapaddr != uio_res->maps[i].addr) {
--
2.11.0
