Hi Olivier,

On Monday 03 July 2017 10:07 PM, Olivier Matz wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jun 2017 17:32:46 +0000, Santosh Shukla 
> <santosh.shu...@caviumnetworks.com> wrote:
>> HW mempool blocks may need physical contiguous obj in a pool.
> This should be clarified: the memory area containing all the
> objects must be physically contiguous, right?

ok.

>> Introducing MEMPOOL_F_POOL_CONTIG flag for such use-case.  The flag
>> useful to detect whether all buffer fits within a hugepage or not. If
>> not then return -ENOSPC. This way, we make sure that all object within a
>> pool is contiguous.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shukla <santosh.shu...@caviumnetworks.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jerin Jacob <jerin.ja...@caviumnetworks.com>
>> ---
>>  lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.c | 8 ++++++++
>>  lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.h | 1 +
>>  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.c 
>> b/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.c
>> index 045baef45..7dec2f51d 100644
>> --- a/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.c
>> +++ b/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.c
>> @@ -368,6 +368,14 @@ rte_mempool_populate_phys(struct rte_mempool *mp, char 
>> *vaddr,
>>  
>>      total_elt_sz = mp->header_size + mp->elt_size + mp->trailer_size;
>>  
>> +    /* Detect nb_mbuf fit in hugepage */
>> +    if (mp->flags & MEMPOOL_F_POOL_CONTIG) {
>> +            if (len < total_elt_sz * mp->size) {
>> +                    RTE_LOG(ERR, MEMPOOL, "nb_mbufs not fitting in one 
>> hugepage,..exit\n");
>> +                    return -ENOSPC;
>> +            }
>> +    }
>> +
> We should not reference mbuf, we are in mempool code, dealing with
> any kind of object.

ok, in v2.

> Also, len is not necessarily the size of a hugepage, but the size of the
> physical area passed to te_mempool_populate_phys().

The idea is to make sure that blk_sz (total_elt_sz * mp->size) fits with in
hugepage. So if rte_eal_has_hugepages() is true then 'len' is
hugepage size, in-case of non-hugepage this condition would fail.

Does that make sense? if so then I'll modify comment and error log.
Otherwise could you pl. suggest better approach to detect phys contiguity.

>>      memhdr = rte_zmalloc("MEMPOOL_MEMHDR", sizeof(*memhdr), 0);
>>      if (memhdr == NULL)
>>              return -ENOMEM;
>> diff --git a/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.h 
>> b/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.h
>> index c3cdc77e4..fd8722e69 100644
>> --- a/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.h
>> +++ b/lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.h
>> @@ -266,6 +266,7 @@ struct rte_mempool {
>>  #define MEMPOOL_F_SC_GET         0x0008 /**< Default get is 
>> "single-consumer".*/
>>  #define MEMPOOL_F_POOL_CREATED   0x0010 /**< Internal: pool is created. */
>>  #define MEMPOOL_F_NO_PHYS_CONTIG 0x0020 /**< Don't need physically 
>> contiguous objs. */
>> +#define MEMPOOL_F_POOL_CONTIG    0x0040 /**< Detect physcially contiguous 
>> objs */
> We must highlight here that it's a capability flag.
> Following my other comments on the first patch, this define should be
> renamed in something else. I suggest:
>
> #define RTE_MEMPOOL_CAPA_PHYS_CONTIG 0x0001
>
> The description should be longer and more accurate.
>
> I'm also a bit puzzled because this is more a limitation than a
> capability.

ok with renaming flag but per my [1/4] comment.

But i find it makes more sense to - not differentiate PHYS_CONTIG
with existing mempool cap flags.

>>  
>>  /**
>>   * @internal When debug is enabled, store some statistics.

Reply via email to