On 7/3/2017 9:27 AM, Adrien Mazarguil wrote:
> Even in C11, using types other than _Bool or signed/unsigned int for
> bit-fields is an extension. Some GCC versions complain about that when
> -pedantic checks are enabled.
>
> The RTE_STD_C11 macro correctly prevented this issue with C99 but not with
> C11 as it becomes a no-op. Forcing the extension keyword addresses it.
>
> Fixes: 143c03925695 ("net/mlx: update C compliance standard")
>
> Signed-off-by: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarg...@6wind.com>
> Tested-by: Yongseok Koh <ys...@mellanox.com>
> ---
> Ferruh, squashing this commit with the previous one and discarding its
> log is fine if you want. Thanks.
Squashed into relevant commit in next-net, thanks.
