On 6/16/2017 6:40 AM, Shreyansh Jain wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agra...@nxp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain <shreyansh.j...@nxp.com>
<...>
> static int
> +dpaa_mtu_set(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t mtu)
> +{
> + struct dpaa_if *dpaa_intf = dev->data->dev_private;
> +
> + PMD_INIT_FUNC_TRACE();
> +
> + if (mtu < ETHER_MIN_MTU)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + fman_if_set_maxfrm(dpaa_intf->fif, mtu);
> +
> + if (mtu > ETHER_MAX_LEN)
> + return -1
Is it OK to have this check after fman_if_set_maxfrm() ?
> + dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode.jumbo_frame = 0;
> +
> + dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode.max_rx_pkt_len = mtu;
I think this only makes sense when jumbo_frame is 1, although not hurts
to set...
> + return 0;
> +}
<...>
