On 18/06/2017 16:52, Gregory Etelson wrote:
Use get_mempolicy(2) to find numa socket on Linux
instead of parsing /proc/self/numa_maps.
When process maps around 1K hugepages
numa_maps file can miss huge records in older Linux kernels.
get_mempolicy() proved more reliable

Requires numactl dev package

Signed-off-by: Gregory Etelson <greg...@weka.io>
---
  lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_memory.c | 85 ++++----------------------------
  mk/exec-env/linuxapp/rte.vars.mk         |  1 +
  mk/internal/rte.build-pre.mk             |  1 +
  3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_memory.c 
b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_memory.c
index e17c9cb..48b71bc 100644
--- a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_memory.c
+++ b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_memory.c
@@ -54,6 +54,7 @@
  #include <sys/time.h>
  #include <signal.h>
  #include <setjmp.h>
+#include <numaif.h>
#include <rte_log.h>
  #include <rte_memory.h>
@@ -495,86 +496,20 @@ unmap_all_hugepages_orig(struct hugepage_file 
*hugepg_tbl, struct hugepage_info
          return 0;
  }
-/*
- * Parse /proc/self/numa_maps to get the NUMA socket ID for each huge
- * page.
- */
  static int
  find_numasocket(struct hugepage_file *hugepg_tbl, struct hugepage_info *hpi)
  {
-       int socket_id;
-       char *end, *nodestr;
-       unsigned i, hp_count = 0;
-       uint64_t virt_addr;
-       char buf[BUFSIZ];
-       char hugedir_str[PATH_MAX];
-       FILE *f;
-
-       f = fopen("/proc/self/numa_maps", "r");
-       if (f == NULL) {
-               RTE_LOG(NOTICE, EAL, "cannot open /proc/self/numa_maps,"
-                               " consider that all memory is in socket_id 
0\n");
-               return 0;
-       }
-
-       snprintf(hugedir_str, sizeof(hugedir_str),
-                       "%s/%s", hpi->hugedir, internal_config.hugefile_prefix);
-
-       /* parse numa map */
-       while (fgets(buf, sizeof(buf), f) != NULL) {
-
-               /* ignore non huge page */
-               if (strstr(buf, " huge ") == NULL &&
-                               strstr(buf, hugedir_str) == NULL)
-                       continue;
-
-               /* get zone addr */
-               virt_addr = strtoull(buf, &end, 16);
-               if (virt_addr == 0 || end == buf) {
-                       RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "%s(): error in numa_maps parsing\n", 
__func__);
-                       goto error;
-               }
-
-               /* get node id (socket id) */
-               nodestr = strstr(buf, " N");
-               if (nodestr == NULL) {
-                       RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "%s(): error in numa_maps parsing\n", 
__func__);
-                       goto error;
-               }
-               nodestr += 2;
-               end = strstr(nodestr, "=");
-               if (end == NULL) {
-                       RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "%s(): error in numa_maps parsing\n", 
__func__);
-                       goto error;
-               }
-               end[0] = '\0';
-               end = NULL;
-
-               socket_id = strtoul(nodestr, &end, 0);
-               if ((nodestr[0] == '\0') || (end == NULL) || (*end != '\0')) {
-                       RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "%s(): error in numa_maps parsing\n", 
__func__);
-                       goto error;
-               }
-
-               /* if we find this page in our mappings, set socket_id */
-               for (i = 0; i < hpi->num_pages[0]; i++) {
-                       void *va = (void *)(unsigned long)virt_addr;
-                       if (hugepg_tbl[i].orig_va == va) {
-                               hugepg_tbl[i].socket_id = socket_id;
-                               hp_count++;
-                       }
+       unsigned int i;
+       for (i = 0; i < hpi->num_pages[0]; i++) {
+               if (get_mempolicy(&hugepg_tbl[i].socket_id,
+                       NULL, 0, hugepg_tbl[i].orig_va,
+                       MPOL_F_NODE | MPOL_F_ADDR) < 0) {
+                       RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "Failed to find NUMA socket for %p\n",
+                               hugepg_tbl[i].orig_va);
+                       return -1;
                }
        }
-
-       if (hp_count < hpi->num_pages[0])
-               goto error;
-
-       fclose(f);
        return 0;
-
-error:
-       fclose(f);
-       return -1;
  }
static int
@@ -1051,8 +986,6 @@ rte_eal_hugepage_init(void)
                }
if (find_numasocket(&tmp_hp[hp_offset], hpi) < 0){
-                       RTE_LOG(DEBUG, EAL, "Failed to find NUMA socket for %u MB 
pages\n",
-                                       (unsigned)(hpi->hugepage_sz / 
0x100000));
                        goto fail;
                }
diff --git a/mk/exec-env/linuxapp/rte.vars.mk b/mk/exec-env/linuxapp/rte.vars.mk
index 9a71699..0da977a 100644
--- a/mk/exec-env/linuxapp/rte.vars.mk
+++ b/mk/exec-env/linuxapp/rte.vars.mk
@@ -59,5 +59,6 @@ LINK_USING_CC := 1
  EXECENV_LDFLAGS += -export-dynamic
  # Add library to the group to resolve symbols
  EXECENV_LDLIBS  += -ldl
+EXECENV_LDLIBS  += -lnuma
export EXECENV_CFLAGS EXECENV_LDFLAGS EXECENV_ASFLAGS EXECENV_LDLIBS
diff --git a/mk/internal/rte.build-pre.mk b/mk/internal/rte.build-pre.mk
index 560cf82..9bc0ffd 100644
--- a/mk/internal/rte.build-pre.mk
+++ b/mk/internal/rte.build-pre.mk
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
  #   (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
  #   OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
+LDLIBS += -lnuma
  _BUILD_TARGETS := _prebuild _build _postbuild
comma := ,

I think following the discussion of libnuma dependency in another thread [1], you would need to implement a similar approach and keep the old method while providing this alternative if libnuma is present. As Ilya mentions in the thread, this is usually the job of tools such as autotools, cmake or meson but given that we do not have such tools in DPDK yet, we rely in a build time config option for libnuma.

Given that we already have a libnuma config option for VHOST, we might be adding anew one for hugepage balancing, I think it would make sense to just have single CONFIG_RTE_LIBNUMA option instead.

Thoughts?

Thanks,
Sergio

[1] http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-June/067298.html

Reply via email to