The error return code for rte_ring_sc_dequeue_bulk() and rte_ring_mc_dequeue_bulk() function should be -ENOENT rather than -ENOBUFS as described in the function description.
Signed-off-by: Anand B Jyoti <anand.b.jy...@intel.com> --- lib/librte_ring/rte_ring.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/librte_ring/rte_ring.h b/lib/librte_ring/rte_ring.h index 97f025a..3400ed8 100644 --- a/lib/librte_ring/rte_ring.h +++ b/lib/librte_ring/rte_ring.h @@ -801,7 +801,7 @@ rte_ring_dequeue_bulk(struct rte_ring *r, void **obj_table, unsigned int n, static inline int __attribute__((always_inline)) rte_ring_mc_dequeue(struct rte_ring *r, void **obj_p) { - return rte_ring_mc_dequeue_bulk(r, obj_p, 1, NULL) ? 0 : -ENOBUFS; + return rte_ring_mc_dequeue_bulk(r, obj_p, 1, NULL) ? 0 : -ENOENT; } /** @@ -819,7 +819,7 @@ rte_ring_mc_dequeue(struct rte_ring *r, void **obj_p) static inline int __attribute__((always_inline)) rte_ring_sc_dequeue(struct rte_ring *r, void **obj_p) { - return rte_ring_sc_dequeue_bulk(r, obj_p, 1, NULL) ? 0 : -ENOBUFS; + return rte_ring_sc_dequeue_bulk(r, obj_p, 1, NULL) ? 0 : -ENOENT; } /** -- 2.7.4