Hi Qi,
> -----Original Message----- > From: Zhang, Qi Z > Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2017 3:46 AM > To: Lu, Wenzhuo; Zhang, Helin > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Zhang, Qi Z > Subject: [PATCH v2 3/3] net/ixgbe: enable flex bytes for generic flow API > > Add fdir flex byte support for rte_flow APIs. > > Signed-off-by: Qi Zhang <qi.z.zh...@intel.com> > --- > > v2: > - fix couple checkpatch errors. > > drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.h | 3 + > drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_fdir.c | 31 ++++++++- > drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_flow.c | 137 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > 3 files changed, 167 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_fdir.c b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_fdir.c > index 7f6c7b5..950f5ba 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_fdir.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_fdir.c > @@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ fdir_set_input_mask_82599(struct rte_eth_dev *dev) > * mask VM pool and DIPv6 since there are currently not supported > * mask FLEX byte, it will be set in flex_conf > */ > - uint32_t fdirm = IXGBE_FDIRM_POOL | IXGBE_FDIRM_DIPv6 | > IXGBE_FDIRM_FLEX; > + uint32_t fdirm = IXGBE_FDIRM_POOL | IXGBE_FDIRM_DIPv6; > uint32_t fdirtcpm; /* TCP source and destination port masks. */ > uint32_t fdiripv6m; /* IPv6 source and destination masks. */ > volatile uint32_t *reg; > @@ -333,6 +333,10 @@ fdir_set_input_mask_82599(struct rte_eth_dev *dev) > return -EINVAL; > } > > + /* flex byte mask */ > + if (info->mask.flex_bytes_mask == 0) > + fdirm |= IXGBE_FDIRM_FLEX; > + > IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_FDIRM, fdirm); Should the same change be done for x550?
