> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lu, Wenzhuo
> Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2017 2:16 PM
> To: Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zh...@intel.com>; Zhang, Helin
> <helin.zh...@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/3] net/ixgbe: enable IPv6 for consistent API
>
> Hi Qi,
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Zhang, Qi Z
> > Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2017 3:53 AM
> > To: Zhang, Helin; Lu, Wenzhuo
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Zhang, Qi Z
> > Subject: [PATCH 3/3] net/ixgbe: enable IPv6 for consistent API
> >
> > Enable IPv6 support with rte_flow API.
> > Only support Sigature Match.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Qi Zhang <qi.z.zh...@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_flow.c | 112
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 104 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> > /* Get the TCP info. */
> > if (item->type == RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_TCP) {
> > /**
> > * Set the flow type even if there's no content
> > * as we must have a flow type.
> > */
> > - rule->ixgbe_fdir.formatted.flow_type =
> > + rule->ixgbe_fdir.formatted.flow_type |=
> > IXGBE_ATR_FLOW_TYPE_TCPV4;
> This macro is misleading, better change it to IXGBE_ATR_L4TYPE_TCP.
>
> > /*Not supported last point for range*/
> > if (item->last) {
> > @@ -1715,7 +1811,7 @@ ixgbe_parse_fdir_filter_normal(const struct
> > rte_flow_attr *attr,
> > * Set the flow type even if there's no content
> > * as we must have a flow type.
> > */
> > - rule->ixgbe_fdir.formatted.flow_type =
> > + rule->ixgbe_fdir.formatted.flow_type |=
> > IXGBE_ATR_FLOW_TYPE_UDPV4;
> IXGBE_ATR_L4TYPE_UDP is better.
>
> > /*Not supported last point for range*/
> > if (item->last) {
> > @@ -1775,7 +1871,7 @@ ixgbe_parse_fdir_filter_normal(const struct
> > rte_flow_attr *attr,
> > * Set the flow type even if there's no content
> > * as we must have a flow type.
> > */
> > - rule->ixgbe_fdir.formatted.flow_type =
> > + rule->ixgbe_fdir.formatted.flow_type |=
> > IXGBE_ATR_FLOW_TYPE_SCTPV4;
> IXGBE_ATR_L4TYPE_SCTP is better.
>
> > /*Not supported last point for range*/
> > if (item->last) {
> > --
> > 2.7.4
Yes, should use the macro but not enum here.
Will change in v2
Thanks
Qi
