Hi, yuanhan & thomas > -----Original Message----- > From: Yuanhan Liu [mailto:yuanhan....@linux.intel.com] > Sent: Monday, April 24, 2017 10:01 AM > To: Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net> > Cc: Zhao1, Wei <wei.zh...@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org; Ananyev, > Konstantin <konstantin.anan...@intel.com>; Mcnamara, John > <john.mcnam...@intel.com>; Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo...@intel.com>; Liu, > Yu Y <yu.y....@intel.com> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] lib/librte_ether: add support for port > reset > > On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:28:37AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > Maybe I should add some words in doc\guides\nics\i40e.rst to Record > > > which configurations are saved and restored by the PMD driver in > > > reset function. Which not list in that are recognized as not saved > > > and restored by default. OTHER NIC for this feature can add similar > > > record in their xxx.rst. > > > > No, when defining a generic API in ethdev, we must define the same > > behaviour for every drivers. > > Agreed. That was my point. > > --yliu > > > Please check how to make the behaviour consistent and documented in > > ethdev. We may need to document your new function and start/stop also.
Do you have any suggestion on which document in rte layer to record store and restore info by me?
