> -----Original Message-----
> From: caihe [mailto:ca...@huawei.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 6, 2017 9:06 AM
> To: Zhang, Helin
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Wu, Jingjing; Zhoujingbin
> Subject: 答复: [PATCH v3] net/i40e: fix return value check issue
> 
> Do you have any idea to fix the patch check warning, this is already the 
> perfect
> way?
Basically we use Linux script tool of checkpatch.pl to check the patch before 
sending it out.
But what's the issue you mentioned above? I don't see anything.

Thanks,
Helin
> 
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Zhang, Helin [mailto:helin.zh...@intel.com]
> 发送时间: 2017年4月5日 23:34
> 收件人: caihe
> 抄送: dev@dpdk.org; Wu, Jingjing; Zhoujingbin
> 主题: RE: [PATCH v3] net/i40e: fix return value check issue
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: henry [mailto:ca...@huawei.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 5, 2017 9:20 PM
> > To: Zhang, Helin
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Wu, Jingjing; zhoujing...@huawei.com; henry cai
> > Subject: [PATCH v3] net/i40e: fix return value check issue
> >
> > From: henry cai <ca...@huawei.com>
> >
> > function i40evf_add_del_all_mac_addr without check return value of
> > rte_zmalloc
> >
> > Fixes: 97ac72aa71a9 ("i40e: support setting VF MAC address ")
> >
> > Signed-off-by: henry cai <ca...@huawei.com>
> Acked-by: Helin Zhang <helin.zh...@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c | 4 ++++
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c
> > b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c
> > index d3659c9..3e0e2e1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c
> > @@ -2016,6 +2016,10 @@ static int i40evf_dev_xstats_get(struct
> > rte_eth_dev *dev,
> >             }
> >
> >             list = rte_zmalloc("i40evf_del_mac_buffer", len, 0);
> > +           if (!list) {
> > +                   PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "fail to allocate memory");
> > +                   return;
> > +           }
> >
> >             for (i = begin; i < next_begin; i++) {
> >                     addr = &dev->data->mac_addrs[i];
> > --
> > 1.8.3.1
> >

Reply via email to