Hi Santosh,
On Wednesday 05 April 2017 12:32 PM, santosh wrote:
On Tuesday 04 April 2017 11:27 AM, Hemant Agrawal wrote:
From: Shreyansh Jain <shreyansh.j...@nxp.com>
Mempool test currently supports:
* ring_mp_mc
* stack
Adding a new default pool options. So, ring* + stack + default
(which can be 'stack' or 'ring')
* This way, whatever the value of RTE_MBUF_DEFAULT_MEMPOOL_OPS is set,
it would be verified.
* even if that means duplicating some test (for example when "stack" is
set as default and it already part of standard test)
Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain <shreyansh.j...@nxp.com>
---
v3: fix the incorrect split
v2: split the fix from change
test/test/test_mempool.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
diff --git a/test/test/test_mempool.c b/test/test/test_mempool.c
index 715b250..6f0ca84 100644
--- a/test/test/test_mempool.c
+++ b/test/test/test_mempool.c
@@ -513,6 +513,7 @@ static int test_mempool_single_consumer(void)
struct rte_mempool *mp_cache = NULL;
struct rte_mempool *mp_nocache = NULL;
struct rte_mempool *mp_stack = NULL;
+ struct rte_mempool *default_pool = NULL;
rte_atomic32_init(&synchro);
@@ -562,6 +563,30 @@ static int test_mempool_single_consumer(void)
}
rte_mempool_obj_iter(mp_stack, my_obj_init, NULL);
+ /* Create a mempool based on Default handler, if not "stack" */
+ printf("Testing %s mempool handler\n",
+ RTE_MBUF_DEFAULT_MEMPOOL_OPS);
+ default_pool = rte_mempool_create_empty("default_pool",
+ MEMPOOL_SIZE,
+ MEMPOOL_ELT_SIZE,
+ RTE_MEMPOOL_CACHE_MAX_SIZE, 0,
+ SOCKET_ID_ANY, 0);
+
+ if (default_pool == NULL) {
+ printf("cannot allocate default mempool\n");
+ goto err;
+ }
+ if (rte_mempool_set_ops_byname(default_pool,
+ RTE_MBUF_DEFAULT_MEMPOOL_OPS, NULL) < 0) {
+ printf("cannot set default handler\n");
Few nits:
printf("cannot allocate %s mempool\n",
RTE_MBUF_DEFAULT_MEMPOOL_OPS)
Ok. I will change this.
+ goto err;
+ }
+ if (rte_mempool_populate_default(default_pool) < 0) {
+ printf("cannot populate default mempool\n");
ditto..
ok
+ goto err;
+ }
+ rte_mempool_obj_iter(default_pool, my_obj_init, NULL);
+
/* retrieve the mempool from its name */
if (rte_mempool_lookup("test_nocache") != mp_nocache) {
printf("Cannot lookup mempool from its name\n");
@@ -606,6 +631,9 @@ static int test_mempool_single_consumer(void)
if (test_mempool_basic(mp_stack, 1) < 0)
goto err;
+ if (test_mempool_basic(default_pool, 1) < 0)
+ goto err;
+
rte_mempool_list_dump(stdout);
ret = 0;
@@ -614,6 +642,8 @@ static int test_mempool_single_consumer(void)
rte_mempool_free(mp_nocache);
rte_mempool_free(mp_cache);
rte_mempool_free(mp_stack);
+ rte_mempool_free(default_pool);
+
Rest looks okay to me:
Reviewed-by: Santosh Shukla <santosh.shu...@caviumnetworks.com>
Thanks. I will send v4 of this.
return ret;
}