On 03/31/2017 07:09 PM, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy wrote:
On 31/03/2017 16:56, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
PCI address structure has padding which may have garbage.
Fixes: 2f4adfad0a69 ("vfio: add multiprocess support")
Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybche...@solarflare.com>
---
It is a real bug which I've hit during multi-process debugging.
lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_pci_vfio.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_pci_vfio.c
b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_pci_vfio.c
index 5f478c5..7d8b9fb 100644
--- a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_pci_vfio.c
+++ b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_pci_vfio.c
@@ -355,7 +355,8 @@ pci_vfio_map_resource(struct rte_pci_device *dev)
} else {
/* if we're in a secondary process, just find our tailq
entry */
TAILQ_FOREACH(vfio_res, vfio_res_list, next) {
- if (memcmp(&vfio_res->pci_addr, &dev->addr,
sizeof(dev->addr)))
+ if (rte_eal_compare_pci_addr(&vfio_res->pci_addr,
+ &dev->addr))
continue;
break;
}
Different commit, same patch :)
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__dpdk.org_dev_patchwork_patch_21828_&d=DQICaQ&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=flTOx6Av679My7o_iScb5sOlLD68bpUyE2RUtfW3SWQ&m=uvsF8SJaLsRNp3l01Ji5iD4EB1hkHVPOX_dFKqTu_mU&s=HYxvqVvNsbEzQgMJmwQuH6G7vqOkyg7vJ1PrzsxKr5c&e=
True, sorry, lost your patch from my view.
I'm not sure which state should be set on my patch in the patchwork.
Thomas, please, resolve it properly.
Thanks,
Andrew.
