It's possible that the application could take a corrective action here,
and either prompt the user for different arguments, or at least perform
a better logging.  Exiting this early prevents any useful information
gathering from the application layer.

Signed-off-by: Aaron Conole <acon...@redhat.com>
---
 lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal.c   | 8 ++++++--
 lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c | 8 ++++++--
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal.c b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal.c
index 60de9f9..ab34c0d 100644
--- a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal.c
+++ b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal.c
@@ -528,8 +528,12 @@ rte_eal_init(int argc, char **argv)
        }
 
        fctret = eal_parse_args(argc, argv);
-       if (fctret < 0)
-               exit(1);
+       if (fctret < 0) {
+               rte_eal_init_alert("Invalid 'command line' arguments.");
+               rte_errno = EINVAL;
+               rte_atomic32_clear(&run_once);
+               return -1;
+       }
 
        if (internal_config.no_hugetlbfs == 0 &&
                        internal_config.process_type != RTE_PROC_SECONDARY &&
diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c 
b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c
index 161f726..a671ed4 100644
--- a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c
+++ b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c
@@ -785,8 +785,12 @@ rte_eal_init(int argc, char **argv)
        }
 
        fctret = eal_parse_args(argc, argv);
-       if (fctret < 0)
-               exit(1);
+       if (fctret < 0) {
+               rte_eal_init_alert("Invalid 'command line' arguments.");
+               rte_errno = EINVAL;
+               rte_atomic32_clear(&run_once);
+               return -1;
+       }
 
        if (internal_config.no_hugetlbfs == 0 &&
                        internal_config.process_type != RTE_PROC_SECONDARY &&
-- 
2.9.3

Reply via email to