2016-08-23 15:42, Rich Lane: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 7:16 AM, Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan....@linux.intel.com> > wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 11:27:06AM -0700, Rich Lane wrote: > > > I could also add back concurrent enqueue support for mergeable RX, but I > > > was hoping to avoid that since the mergeable codepath is already complex > > > and wouldn't be used in high performance deployments. > > > > Another note is that, you might also have noticed, Zhihong made a patch > > set [0] to optimize the enqueue code path (mainly on mergeable path). It > > basically does a rewrite from scatch, which removes the desc buf > > reservation, > > meaning it would be harder to do concurrent enqueue support based on that. > > > > [0]: Aug 19 Zhihong Wang ( 68) ├─>[PATCH v3 0/5] vhost: optimize > > enqueue > > Yes, I'd noticed that these patches would conflict. Once the vhost-cuse > removal and > Zhihong's patches have merged I'll send a new version.
What is the status of this feature?
