On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 07:29:03AM +0000, Nipun Gupta wrote: > Thanks Jerin. Patchwork still shows this patch in new state. > Does this matter or shall I move it to accepted state?
I have moved to accepted state. Thanks. > > Regards, > Nipun > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jerin Jacob [mailto:jerin.ja...@caviumnetworks.com] > > Sent: Monday, March 06, 2017 18:52 > > To: Nipun Gupta <nipun.gu...@nxp.com> > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agra...@nxp.com>; > > bruce.richard...@intel.com; gage.e...@intel.com; > > harry.van.haa...@intel.com > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] eventdev: amend timeout criteria comment for burst > > dequeue > > > > On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 09:56:50PM +0530, Nipun Gupta wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Nipun Gupta <nipun.gu...@nxp.com> > > > Acked-by: Harry van Haaren <harry.van.haa...@intel.com> > > > > Applied to dpdk-next-eventdev/master. Thanks. > > > > > --- > > > Changes for v2: > > > - Fix errors reported by check-git-log.sh > > > Changes for v3: > > > - Corrected comment's language > > > > > > lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.h | 2 +- > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.h > > b/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.h > > > index c2f9310..29f0f46 100644 > > > --- a/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.h > > > +++ b/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.h > > > @@ -1216,7 +1216,7 @@ struct rte_eventdev { > > > * - 0 no-wait, returns immediately if there is no event. > > > * - >0 wait for the event, if the device is configured with > > > * RTE_EVENT_DEV_CFG_PER_DEQUEUE_TIMEOUT then this function will > > wait until > > > - * the event available or *timeout_ticks* time. > > > + * at least one event is available or *timeout_ticks* time. > > > * if the device is not configured with > > RTE_EVENT_DEV_CFG_PER_DEQUEUE_TIMEOUT > > > * then this function will wait until the event available or > > > * *dequeue_timeout_ns* ns which was previously supplied to > > > -- > > > 1.9.1 > > >
