> -----Original Message----- > From: Legacy, Allain [mailto:allain.leg...@windriver.com] > Sent: Friday, March 3, 2017 11:15 AM > To: Dumitrescu, Cristian <cristian.dumitre...@intel.com>; Richardson, Bruce > <bruce.richard...@intel.com> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Jolliffe, Ian (Wind River) <ian.jolli...@windriver.com> > Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/5] cfgfile: add support for unamed global section > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Dumitrescu, Cristian [mailto:cristian.dumitre...@intel.com] > > > > I am not totally against it, but IMO this option is a bit confusing. Again, > what's > > wrong with user explicitly adding the GLOBAL section if needed? > There's nothing wrong with using a global section. It is our preference to > use > this method because we need to support a legacy file format that needs to > be parsed by other non-DPDK applications. Those applications expect this > format.
OK, legacy is a good enough reason for me.
