> -----Original Message----- > From: Legacy, Allain [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, March 3, 2017 11:15 AM > To: Dumitrescu, Cristian <[email protected]>; Richardson, Bruce > <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; Jolliffe, Ian (Wind River) <[email protected]> > Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/5] cfgfile: add support for unamed global section > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Dumitrescu, Cristian [mailto:[email protected]] > > > > I am not totally against it, but IMO this option is a bit confusing. Again, > what's > > wrong with user explicitly adding the GLOBAL section if needed? > There's nothing wrong with using a global section. It is our preference to > use > this method because we need to support a legacy file format that needs to > be parsed by other non-DPDK applications. Those applications expect this > format.
OK, legacy is a good enough reason for me.
