Bruce Richardson <bruce.richard...@intel.com> writes: > On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 11:02:43AM -0500, Aaron Conole wrote: >> In many cases, it's enough to simply let the application know that the >> call to initialize DPDK has failed. A complete halt can then be >> decided by the application based on error returned (and the app could >> even attempt a possible re-attempt after some corrective action by the >> user or application). >> > Spotted a few issues when I tried applying each of the patches and > compile testing them; those I've flagged on the patches that I test > applied. Otherwise, this looks a great set to have. > > I assume the equivalent changes to the BSD EAL are "left as an exercise > for the reader"? :-)
For now. In my copious free time, I might have a crack at it, although I don't have a working BSD DPDK setup. > /Bruce
