Hi Bruce, Yes, v2 patch is same as v1 + indentation changes according to checkpatch warnings.
Regards, Vlad > -----Original Message----- > From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richard...@intel.com] > Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2017 2:03 PM > To: Vladyslav Buslov > Cc: dev@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] lpm: extend IPv6 next hop field > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 04:46:39PM +0200, Vladyslav Buslov wrote: > > This patch extend next_hop field from 8-bits to 21-bits in LPM library > > for IPv6. > > > > Added versioning symbols to functions and updated library and > > applications that have a dependency on LPM library. > > > > Signed-off-by: Vladyslav Buslov <vladyslav.bus...@harmonicinc.com> > Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richard...@intel.com> > > Hi Vlad, > > Thanks for the V2. > I assume that this is just the V1 with the checkpatch issues fixed, right? For > future use, please include just below the cut line "---" a short list of what > has > changed since the previous version, so that we know what to look for if we > already have reviewed the previous version. > For minor changes in code, like in this case, you can also keep the ack on the > resubmission, putting it just below the signoff like above. > > /Bruce
