2016-11-11 04:49, Tan, Jianfeng:
> Hi Thomas and Konrad,
>
> On 11/11/2016 2:59 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >> 2016-11-07 07:38, Jianfeng Tan:
> >>> As some users are still using xen as the hypervisor, I suggest to
> >>> continue support for xen in DPDK. And from 16.11, I will be the
> >>> maintainer of all xen-related files.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Jianfeng Tan <jianfeng....@intel.com>
> >> Applied
> >>
> >> Please Jianfeng, could you start your new role by sending a status
> >> of Xen dom0 support in DPDK? I think there are some issues in latest
> >> releases.
>
> Yes, I'm on this. And hope to send out update in the next week.
>
> > Pls also CC me and xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org if possible.
>
> Glad to do that.
>
> Thanks,
> Jianfeng
Any news about Xen dom0 status in DPDK?
I think there is not enough interest for Xen dom0 in the DPDK community.
Last time we talked about, it was because of a severe bug which is not
fixed yet:
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-July/044207.html
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-July/044376.html
The request (6 month ago) was to give more time for feedbacks:
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-July/044847.html
Is it time now to officially remove Dom0 support?
