> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richardson, Bruce
> Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 11:25 AM
> To: Mcnamara, John <john.mcnam...@intel.com>
> Cc: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monja...@6wind.com>; Zhigang Lu
> <z...@ezchip.com>; Liming Sun <l...@ezchip.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: announce TILE-Gx removal
> 
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 08:50:07AM +0000, Mcnamara, John wrote:
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon
> > > Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 10:53 AM
> > > To: Zhigang Lu <z...@ezchip.com>; Liming Sun <l...@ezchip.com>
> > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: announce TILE-Gx removal
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monja...@6wind.com>
> > > ---
> > >  doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst | 3 +++
> > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> > > b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> > > index b49e0a0..d40b137 100644
> > > --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> > > +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> > > @@ -62,3 +62,6 @@ Deprecation Notices
> > >    PMDs that implement the latter.
> > >    Target release for removal of the legacy API will be defined once
> most
> > >    PMDs have switched to rte_flow.
> > > +
> > > +* The architecture TILE-Gx and the associated mpipe driver are not
> > > +  maintained and will be removed in 17.05.
> >
> > The notification should probably be for removal in 17.08, to one release
> cycle to respond/fix/update.
> >
> > It would also be good to hear from EZChip/Mellanox on this.
> >
> > John
> 
> If - as seems likely - this deprecation notice makes it into the 17.02
> release, I would just ask that the actual removal of the code *not* take
> place at the start of the 17.05 release cycle, to be sure to give further
> additional grace period for someone to respond to this. I think it is only
> fair to wait till just before the RC's are produced to remove the code,
> given it is such a drastic step, and the official notice of removal is
> only inserted right before 17.02 goes out.
> 

Hi,

That seems like a fair compromise.

John

Reply via email to