(resent to fix email address)
2017-02-13 14:25, Thomas Monjalon:
> In the crypto API, the drivers are listed.
> In my opinion, it is a wrong designed and these lists should be removed.
> Do we need a deprecation notice to plan this removal in 17.05, while
> working on bus abstraction?
>
>
> lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.h:
>
> #define CRYPTODEV_NAME_NULL_PMD crypto_null
> /**< Null crypto PMD device name */
> #define CRYPTODEV_NAME_AESNI_MB_PMD crypto_aesni_mb
> /**< AES-NI Multi buffer PMD device name */
> #define CRYPTODEV_NAME_AESNI_GCM_PMD crypto_aesni_gcm
> /**< AES-NI GCM PMD device name */
> #define CRYPTODEV_NAME_OPENSSL_PMD crypto_openssl
> /**< Open SSL Crypto PMD device name */
> #define CRYPTODEV_NAME_QAT_SYM_PMD crypto_qat
> /**< Intel QAT Symmetric Crypto PMD device name */
> #define CRYPTODEV_NAME_SNOW3G_PMD crypto_snow3g
> /**< SNOW 3G PMD device name */
> #define CRYPTODEV_NAME_KASUMI_PMD crypto_kasumi
> /**< KASUMI PMD device name */
> #define CRYPTODEV_NAME_ZUC_PMD crypto_zuc
> /**< KASUMI PMD device name */
> #define CRYPTODEV_NAME_ARMV8_PMD crypto_armv8
> /**< ARMv8 Crypto PMD device name */
> #define CRYPTODEV_NAME_SCHEDULER_PMD crypto_scheduler
> /**< Scheduler Crypto PMD device name */
>
> /** Crypto device type */
> enum rte_cryptodev_type {
> RTE_CRYPTODEV_NULL_PMD = 1, /**< Null crypto PMD */
> RTE_CRYPTODEV_AESNI_GCM_PMD, /**< AES-NI GCM PMD */
> RTE_CRYPTODEV_AESNI_MB_PMD, /**< AES-NI multi buffer PMD */
> RTE_CRYPTODEV_QAT_SYM_PMD, /**< QAT PMD Symmetric Crypto */
> RTE_CRYPTODEV_SNOW3G_PMD, /**< SNOW 3G PMD */
> RTE_CRYPTODEV_KASUMI_PMD, /**< KASUMI PMD */
> RTE_CRYPTODEV_ZUC_PMD, /**< ZUC PMD */
> RTE_CRYPTODEV_OPENSSL_PMD, /**< OpenSSL PMD */
> RTE_CRYPTODEV_ARMV8_PMD, /**< ARMv8 crypto PMD */
> RTE_CRYPTODEV_SCHEDULER_PMD, /**< Crypto Scheduler PMD */
> };
