Hi, Ferruh
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yigit, Ferruh
> Sent: Monday, January 23, 2017 8:23 PM
> To: Zhao1, Wei <wei.zh...@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: zhao wei <wei.zh...@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] net/ixgbe: add more check in n-tuple
> filter
>
> On 1/23/2017 3:32 AM, Wei Zhao wrote:
> > Add more check on the mask of src_addr, dst_addr and next_proto_id in
> > n-tuple filter rule pattern parser.If do not add such check, it maybe
> > cause error in pattern parser.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: zhao wei <wei.zh...@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_flow.c | 5 ++++-
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_flow.c
> > b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_flow.c index 82aceed..8f78eee 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_flow.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_flow.c
> > @@ -331,7 +331,10 @@ cons_parse_ntuple_filter(const struct
> rte_flow_attr *attr,
> > ipv4_mask->hdr.packet_id ||
> > ipv4_mask->hdr.fragment_offset ||
> > ipv4_mask->hdr.time_to_live ||
> > - ipv4_mask->hdr.hdr_checksum) {
> > + ipv4_mask->hdr.hdr_checksum ||
> > + !ipv4_mask->hdr.next_proto_id ||
> > + !ipv4_mask->hdr.dst_addr ||
> > + !ipv4_mask->hdr.src_addr ||) {
>
> The '||' at the end seems extra.
>
> Also can you please confirm your sign off?
>
> > rte_flow_error_set(error,
> > EINVAL, RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM,
> > item, "Not supported by ntuple filter");
> >
This patch has been change to suspended on patchwork net.
Thank you.
