On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 11:19:45AM +0000, Nipun Gupta wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Jerin Jacob
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2016 14:55
> > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > Cc: thomas.monja...@6wind.com; bruce.richard...@intel.com; Hemant
> > Agrawal <hemant.agra...@nxp.com>; gage.e...@intel.com;
> > harry.van.haa...@intel.com; Jerin Jacob <jerin.ja...@caviumnetworks.com>
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/6] eventdev: implement the northbound APIs
> >
> > This patch implements northbound eventdev API interface using southbond
> > driver interface
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jerin Jacob <jerin.ja...@caviumnetworks.com>
> > Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richard...@intel.com>
> > ---
> > config/common_base | 6 +
> > lib/Makefile | 1 +
> > lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_log.h | 1 +
> > lib/librte_eventdev/Makefile | 57 ++
> > lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.c | 986
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.h | 106 ++-
> > lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev_pmd.h | 109 +++
> > lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev_version.map | 33 +
> > mk/rte.app.mk | 1 +
> > 9 files changed, 1294 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) create mode 100644
> > lib/librte_eventdev/Makefile create mode 100644
> > lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev.c
> > create mode 100644 lib/librte_eventdev/rte_eventdev_version.map
> >
>
> <Snip>
>
> > +static inline int
> > +rte_event_dev_port_config(struct rte_eventdev *dev, uint8_t nb_ports) {
> > + uint8_t old_nb_ports = dev->data->nb_ports;
> > + void **ports;
> > + uint16_t *links_map;
> > + uint8_t *ports_dequeue_depth;
> > + uint8_t *ports_enqueue_depth;
> > + unsigned int i;
> > +
> > + RTE_EDEV_LOG_DEBUG("Setup %d ports on device %u", nb_ports,
> > + dev->data->dev_id);
> > +
> > + /* First time configuration */
> > + if (dev->data->ports == NULL && nb_ports != 0) {
> > + dev->data->ports = rte_zmalloc_socket("eventdev->data-
> > >ports",
> > + sizeof(dev->data->ports[0]) * nb_ports,
> > + RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE, dev->data->socket_id);
> > + if (dev->data->ports == NULL) {
> > + dev->data->nb_ports = 0;
> > + RTE_EDEV_LOG_ERR("failed to get mem for port meta
> > data,"
> > + "nb_ports %u", nb_ports);
> > + return -(ENOMEM);
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Allocate memory to store ports dequeue depth */
> > + dev->data->ports_dequeue_depth =
> > + rte_zmalloc_socket("eventdev-
> > >ports_dequeue_depth",
> > + sizeof(dev->data->ports_dequeue_depth[0]) *
> > nb_ports,
> > + RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE, dev->data->socket_id);
> > + if (dev->data->ports_dequeue_depth == NULL) {
> > + dev->data->nb_ports = 0;
> > + RTE_EDEV_LOG_ERR("failed to get mem for port deq
> > meta,"
> > + "nb_ports %u", nb_ports);
> > + return -(ENOMEM);
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Allocate memory to store ports enqueue depth */
> > + dev->data->ports_enqueue_depth =
> > + rte_zmalloc_socket("eventdev-
> > >ports_enqueue_depth",
> > + sizeof(dev->data->ports_enqueue_depth[0]) *
> > nb_ports,
> > + RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE, dev->data->socket_id);
> > + if (dev->data->ports_enqueue_depth == NULL) {
> > + dev->data->nb_ports = 0;
> > + RTE_EDEV_LOG_ERR("failed to get mem for port enq
> > meta,"
> > + "nb_ports %u", nb_ports);
> > + return -(ENOMEM);
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Allocate memory to store queue to port link connection */
> > + dev->data->links_map =
> > + rte_zmalloc_socket("eventdev->links_map",
> > + sizeof(dev->data->links_map[0]) * nb_ports *
> > + RTE_EVENT_MAX_QUEUES_PER_DEV,
> > + RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE, dev->data->socket_id);
> > + if (dev->data->links_map == NULL) {
> > + dev->data->nb_ports = 0;
> > + RTE_EDEV_LOG_ERR("failed to get mem for port_map
> > area,"
> > + "nb_ports %u", nb_ports);
> > + return -(ENOMEM);
> > + }
>
> I think we also need to set all the 'links map' to
> EVENT_QUEUE_SERVICE_PRIORITY_INVALID
> on zmalloc.
Just after the port_setup, we are setting to
EVENT_QUEUE_SERVICE_PRIORITY_INVALID in
rte_event_port_unlink(). So it looks OK to me.
diag = (*dev->dev_ops->port_setup)(dev, port_id, port_conf);
/* Unlink all the queues from this port(default state after
* setup) */
if (!diag)
diag = rte_event_port_unlink(dev_id, port_id, NULL, 0);
>
> > + } else if (dev->data->ports != NULL && nb_ports != 0) {/* re-config */
> > + RTE_FUNC_PTR_OR_ERR_RET(*dev->dev_ops->port_release, -
> > ENOTSUP);
> > +
> > + ports = dev->data->ports;
> > + ports_dequeue_depth = dev->data->ports_dequeue_depth;
> > + ports_enqueue_depth = dev->data->ports_enqueue_depth;
> > + links_map = dev->data->links_map;
> > +
>
> <Snip>
>
> > +int
> > +rte_event_port_setup(uint8_t dev_id, uint8_t port_id,
> > + const struct rte_event_port_conf *port_conf) {
> > + struct rte_eventdev *dev;
> > + struct rte_event_port_conf def_conf;
> > + int diag;
> > +
> > + RTE_EVENTDEV_VALID_DEVID_OR_ERR_RET(dev_id, -EINVAL);
> > + dev = &rte_eventdevs[dev_id];
> > +
> > + if (!is_valid_port(dev, port_id)) {
> > + RTE_EDEV_LOG_ERR("Invalid port_id=%" PRIu8, port_id);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Check new_event_threshold limit */
> > + if ((port_conf && !port_conf->new_event_threshold) ||
> > + (port_conf && port_conf->new_event_threshold >
> > + dev->data->dev_conf.nb_events_limit)) {
>
> As mentioned in 'rte_eventdev.h', the 'new_event_threshold' is valid for
> *closed systems*,
> so is the above check valid for *open systems*?
new_event_threshold is valid only for *closed systems*. If you need any
change then please suggest.
> Or is it implicit that for open systems the 'port_conf->new_event_threshold'
> should be
> set to '-1' by the application just as it is for 'max_num_events' of 'struct
> rte_event_dev_info'.
>
> > + RTE_EDEV_LOG_ERR(
> > + "dev%d port%d Invalid event_threshold=%d
> > nb_events_limit=%d",
> > + dev_id, port_id, port_conf->new_event_threshold,
> > + dev->data->dev_conf.nb_events_limit);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
>
> <Snip>
>
> Regards,
> Nipun
