Hi,
Sorry if you feel your patch is ignored.
It is not in the right format for several reasons we tried
to explain earlier I think.
Please read carefully this doc:
http://dpdk.org/doc/guides/contributing/patches.html
2017-01-16 19:16, Maple:
> From: Maple <liuj...@raisecom.com>
> To: <qiming.y...@intel.com>;<dev@dpdk.org>
> Cc: <maintain...@dpdk.org>
> Subject: [PATCH] Load_balancer Tx Flush Bug
> Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2017 19:15:48 +0800
> Message-Id: <1482371868-19669-1-git-send-email-liuj...@raisecom.com>
> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.1
> In-Reply-To: <2016122122394164225...@raisecom.com>
> References: <2016122122394164225...@raisecom.com>
>
> We found a bug in use load_balancer example,and,This bug DPDK each version.
> In IO tx flush, only flush port 0.
> So,If I enable more than the Port,then,In addition to 0 port won't flush.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maple <liuj...@raisecom.com>
> ---
> a/examples/load_balancer/runtime.c | 667 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> b/examples/load_balancer/runtime.c | 669
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 1336 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 a/examples/load_balancer/runtime.c
> create mode 100644 b/examples/load_balancer/runtime.c
>
> diff --git a/examples/load_balancer/runtime.c
> b/examples/load_balancer/runtime.c
> index 9612392..3a2e900 100644
> --- a/test/a/examples/load_balancer/runtime.c
> +++ b/test/b/examples/load_balancer/runtime.c
> @@ -418,9 +418,11 @@ app_lcore_io_tx(
> static inline void
> app_lcore_io_tx_flush(struct app_lcore_params_io *lp)
> {
> + uint8_t i;
> uint8_t port;
>
> - for (port = 0; port < lp->tx.n_nic_ports; port ++) {
> + port = lp->tx.nic_ports[0];
> + for (i = 0; i < lp->tx.n_nic_ports; i ++) {
> uint32_t n_pkts;
>
> if (likely((lp->tx.mbuf_out_flush[port] == 0) ||
>
