On 12/22/2016 9:48 AM, Zhao1, Wei wrote:
> Hi, Yigit
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Yigit, Ferruh
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2016 12:56 AM
>> To: Zhao1, Wei <wei.zh...@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
>> Cc: Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo...@intel.com>
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 01/18] net/ixgbe: store SYN filter
>>
>> On 12/2/2016 10:42 AM, Wei Zhao wrote:
>>> From: wei zhao1 <wei.zh...@intel.com>
>>>
>>> Add support for storing SYN filter in SW.
>>
>> Do you think does it makes more clear to refer as TCP SYN filter? Or SYN
>> filter
>> is clear enough?
>>
>
> Ok, I will change to " TCP SYN filter " to make it more clear
>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Wenzhuo Lu <wenzhuo...@intel.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: wei zhao1 <wei.zh...@intel.com>
>>
>> Can you please update sign-off to your actual name?
>>
>
> Ok, I will change to " Signed-off-by: Wei Zhao <wei.zh...@intel.com>"
>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c | 12 ++++++++++--
>>> drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.h | 2 ++
>>> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
>>> b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
>>> index edc9b22..7f10cca 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
>>> @@ -1287,6 +1287,8 @@ eth_ixgbe_dev_init(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev)
>>> memset(filter_info->fivetuple_mask, 0,
>>> sizeof(uint32_t) * IXGBE_5TUPLE_ARRAY_SIZE);
>>>
>>> + /* initialize SYN filter */
>>> + filter_info->syn_info = 0;
>>
>> can it be an option to memset all filter_info? (and of course move list init
>> after memset)
>>
>
> Maybe, change to the following code?
>
> memset(filter_info, 0, sizeof(struct ixgbe_filter_info));
> TAILQ_INIT(&filter_info->fivetuple_list);
>
> But that wiil mix /* initialize ether type filter */ and /* initialize 5tuple
> filter list */ two process together,
> Because struct ixgbe_filter_info store two type info of ether and 5tuple.
I see filter info consist of different filter types, but as far as I can
see they are not used before this memset, so what is the problem of
cleaning all struct?
Currently memset a sub-set of struct, and assigns zero to other field
explicitly, and rest remains undefined and unused. I am suggesting
memset whole structure and get rid of zero assignment.
> So, not to change ?
>
> struct ixgbe_filter_info {
> uint8_t ethertype_mask; /* Bit mask for every used ethertype filter */
> /* store used ethertype filters*/
> struct ixgbe_ethertype_filter ethertype_filters[IXGBE_MAX_ETQF_FILTERS];
> /* Bit mask for every used 5tuple filter */
> uint32_t fivetuple_mask[IXGBE_5TUPLE_ARRAY_SIZE];
> struct ixgbe_5tuple_filter_list fivetuple_list;
> /* store the SYN filter info */
> uint32_t syn_info;
> };
>
>
<...>
