On 12/19/2016 9:46 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Tue, 20 Dec 2016 02:23:40 +0530
Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agra...@nxp.com> wrote:
Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agra...@nxp.com>
---
lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h
index 9678179..0b601e9 100644
--- a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h
+++ b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h
@@ -1626,6 +1626,7 @@ struct rte_eth_dev {
eth_rx_burst_t rx_pkt_burst; /**< Pointer to PMD receive function. */
eth_tx_burst_t tx_pkt_burst; /**< Pointer to PMD transmit function. */
struct rte_eth_dev_data *data; /**< Pointer to device data */
+ struct rte_device *device;
const struct eth_driver *driver;/**< Driver for this device */
const struct eth_dev_ops *dev_ops; /**< Functions exported by PMD */
struct rte_pci_device *pci_dev; /**< PCI info. supplied by probing */
NAK
I would rather that rte_pci_device be eliminated from rte_eth_dev_data and
replace by more generic rte_device. I am working on a patch set to do this,
it is not fundamentally hard.
As discussed before, this patch is just an stop-gap arrangement till we
get a proper solution. That is the very reason, I put it as first patch
in my patchset - to be removed easily.
It is helpful that you are coming with the proper solution.
