On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 04:37:12PM +0800, Jianbo Liu wrote:
> On 14 December 2016 at 09:55, Jerin Jacob
> <jerin.ja...@caviumnetworks.com> wrote:
> > From: Santosh Shukla <santosh.shu...@caviumnetworks.com>
> >
> > Replace the raw I/O device memory read/write access with eal
> > abstraction for I/O device memory read/write access to fix
> > portability issues across different architectures.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Santosh Shukla <santosh.shu...@caviumnetworks.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jerin Jacob <jerin.ja...@caviumnetworks.com>
> > CC: Helin Zhang <helin.zh...@intel.com>
> > CC: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.anan...@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/ixgbe/base/ixgbe_osdep.h | 13 +++++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/base/ixgbe_osdep.h
> > b/drivers/net/ixgbe/base/ixgbe_osdep.h
> > index 77f0af5..9d16c21 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/base/ixgbe_osdep.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/base/ixgbe_osdep.h
> > @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
> > #include <rte_cycles.h>
> > #include <rte_log.h>
> > #include <rte_byteorder.h>
> > +#include <rte_io.h>
> >
> > #include "../ixgbe_logs.h"
> > #include "../ixgbe_bypass_defines.h"
> > @@ -121,16 +122,20 @@ typedef int bool;
> >
> > #define prefetch(x) rte_prefetch0(x)
> >
> > -#define IXGBE_PCI_REG(reg) (*((volatile uint32_t *)(reg)))
> > +#define IXGBE_PCI_REG(reg) ({ \
> > + uint32_t __val; \
> > + __val = rte_readl(reg); \
> > + __val; \
> > +})
> >
> > static inline uint32_t ixgbe_read_addr(volatile void* addr)
> > {
> > return rte_le_to_cpu_32(IXGBE_PCI_REG(addr));
> > }
> >
> > -#define IXGBE_PCI_REG_WRITE(reg, value) do { \
> > - IXGBE_PCI_REG((reg)) = (rte_cpu_to_le_32(value)); \
> > -} while(0)
> > +#define IXGBE_PCI_REG_WRITE(reg, value) ({ \
> > + rte_writel(rte_cpu_to_le_32(value), reg); \
> > +})
> >
>
> memory barrier operation is put inside IXGBE_PCI_REG_READ/WRITE in
> your change, but I found rte_*mb is called before these macros in some
> places.
> Can you remove all these redundant calls? And please do the same
> checking for other drivers.
>
Ok.
Thinking of adding _relaxed_rd/wr style macro agnostic to arch for ixgbe case
in particular. Such that for those code incident:
x86 case> first default barrier + relaxed call.
arm case> first default barrier + relaxed call.
Does that make sense to you? If so then will take care in v2.
Santosh.
> > #define IXGBE_PCI_REG_ADDR(hw, reg) \
> > ((volatile uint32_t *)((char *)(hw)->hw_addr + (reg)))
> > --
> > 2.5.5
> >
