On 9/29/2016 6:35 PM, Christian Ehrhardt wrote: > The patch misses a fixed: line which it should get I think.
The bug has existed from the day the DPDK was open-sourced, i.e, there wasn't a specific commit that introduced this feature/bug, hence wasn't sure if it needed the fixes tag. > > But in general If applied -> stable for this one? > Yes. > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 11:24 PM, Nikhil Rao <nikhil.rao at intel.com > <mailto:nikhil.rao at intel.com>> wrote: > > The original code used movl instead of xchgl, this caused > rte_atomic64_cmpset to use ebx as the lower dword of the source > to cmpxchg8b instead of the lower dword of function argument "src". > > Reported-by: Job Abraham <job.abraham at intel.com <mailto:job.abraham at > intel.com>> > Tested-by: Job Abraham <job.abraham at intel.com <mailto:job.abraham at > intel.com>> > Signed-off-by: Nikhil Rao <nikhil.rao at intel.com <mailto:nikhil.rao at > intel.com>> > --- > lib/librte_eal/common/include/arch/x86/rte_atomic_32.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/arch/x86/rte_atomic_32.h > b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/arch/x86/rte_atomic_32.h > index 2e04c75..fb3abf1 100644 > --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/arch/x86/rte_atomic_32.h > +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/arch/x86/rte_atomic_32.h > @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ rte_atomic64_cmpset(volatile uint64_t *dst, uint64_t > exp, uint64_t src) > : "memory" ); /* no-clobber list */ > #else > asm volatile ( > - "mov %%ebx, %%edi\n" > + "xchgl %%ebx, %%edi;\n" > MPLOCKED > "cmpxchg8b (%[dst]);" > "setz %[res];" > -- > 2.7.4 > > > > > -- > Christian Ehrhardt > Software Engineer, Ubuntu Server > Canonical Ltd