On 23 September 2016 at 10:56, Wang, Zhihong <zhihong.wang at intel.com> wrote: ..... > This is expected because the 2nd patch is just a baseline and all optimization > patches are organized in the rest of this patch set. > > I think you can do bottleneck analysis on ARM to see what's slowing down the > perf, there might be some micro-arch complications there, mostly likely in > memcpy. > > Do you use glibc's memcpy? I suggest to hand-crafted it on your own. > > Could you publish the mrg_rxbuf=on data also? Since it's more widely used > in terms of spec integrity. > I don't think it will be helpful for you, considering the differences between x86 and arm. So please move on with this patchset...
Thanks! Jianbo
