> -----Original Message----- > From: Nikhil Jagtap [mailto:nikhil.jagtap at gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, September 7, 2016 7:15 AM > To: Dumitrescu, Cristian <cristian.dumitrescu at intel.com> > Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Ramia, Kannan Babu <kannan.babu.ramia at intel.com>; > Nikhil Jagtap <nikhil.jagtap at gmail.com> > Subject: [PATCH] meter: fix excess token bucket update in srtcm > implementation > > As per srTCM RFC 2697, we should be updating the E bucket only after the > C bucket overflows. This patch fixes the current DPDK implementation, > where we are updating both the buckets simultaneously at the same rate > (CIR) which results in token accumulation rate of (2*CIR). > > Signed-off-by: Nikhil Jagtap <nikhil.jagtap at gmail.com> > --- > lib/librte_meter/rte_meter.h | 26 ++++++++++++++++---------- > 1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/lib/librte_meter/rte_meter.h b/lib/librte_meter/rte_meter.h > index 2cd8d81..0ffcb60 100644 > --- a/lib/librte_meter/rte_meter.h > +++ b/lib/librte_meter/rte_meter.h > @@ -232,13 +232,16 @@ rte_meter_srtcm_color_blind_check(struct > rte_meter_srtcm *m, > n_periods = time_diff / m->cir_period; > m->time += n_periods * m->cir_period; > > + /* Put the tokens overflowing from tc into te bucket */ > tc = m->tc + n_periods * m->cir_bytes_per_period; > - if (tc > m->cbs) > + if (tc > m->cbs) { > + te = m->te + (tc - m->cbs); > + if (te > m->ebs) > + te = m->ebs; > tc = m->cbs; > - > - te = m->te + n_periods * m->cir_bytes_per_period; > - if (te > m->ebs) > - te = m->ebs; > + } else { > + te = m->te; > + }
Just to avoid the final else, in order to have the critical path (Tc not overflowing) as the default fall-through code path, I suggest the following small change in the code (update the Te just after Tc update, for the case of Tc overflowing), which should favour the usage of the cmov instruction: /* Put the tokens overflowing from tc into te bucket */ tc = m->tc + n_periods * m->cir_bytes_per_period; te = m->te; if (tc > m->cbs) { te = m->te + (tc - m->cbs); if (te > m->ebs) te = m->ebs; tc = m->cbs; } Are you OK with this change? > > /* Color logic */ > if (tc >= pkt_len) { > @@ -271,13 +274,16 @@ rte_meter_srtcm_color_aware_check(struct > rte_meter_srtcm *m, > n_periods = time_diff / m->cir_period; > m->time += n_periods * m->cir_period; > > + /* Put the tokens overflowing from tc into te bucket */ > tc = m->tc + n_periods * m->cir_bytes_per_period; > - if (tc > m->cbs) > + if (tc > m->cbs) { > + te = m->te + (tc - m->cbs); > + if (te > m->ebs) > + te = m->ebs; > tc = m->cbs; > - > - te = m->te + n_periods * m->cir_bytes_per_period; > - if (te > m->ebs) > - te = m->ebs; > + } else { > + te = m->te; > + } Same as above. > > /* Color logic */ > if ((pkt_color == e_RTE_METER_GREEN) && (tc >= pkt_len)) { > -- > 1.7.1