Hi Stephen,

> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Stephen
> Hemminger
> Sent: Friday, October 28, 2016 3:12 PM
> 
> On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 23:37:57 -0700
> Rasesh Mody <rasesh.mody at qlogic.com> wrote:
> 
> > From: Rasesh Mody <Rasesh.Mody at cavium.com>
> >
> > Using GCC_VERSION to check gcc version and decide whether to include
> > that compiler option.
> >
> > Fixes: ec94dbc57362 ("qede: add base driver")
> > Fixes: ecc7a5a27ffe ("net/qede/base: fix 32-bit build")
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rasesh Mody <Rasesh.Mody at cavium.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/qede/Makefile | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/qede/Makefile b/drivers/net/qede/Makefile
> > index 39751e4..29b443d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/qede/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/net/qede/Makefile
> > @@ -46,11 +46,11 @@ endif
> >  endif
> >
> >  ifeq ($(CONFIG_RTE_TOOLCHAIN_GCC),y)
> > -ifeq ($(shell gcc -Wno-unused-but-set-variable -Werror -E - <
> > /dev/null > /dev/null 2>&1; echo $$?),0)
> > +ifeq ($(shell test $(GCC_VERSION) -ge 44 && echo 1), 1)
> >  CFLAGS_BASE_DRIVER += -Wno-unused-but-set-variable  endif
> > CFLAGS_BASE_DRIVER += -Wno-missing-declarations -ifeq ($(shell gcc
> > -Wno-maybe-uninitialized -Werror -E - < /dev/null > /dev/null 2>&1;
> > echo $$?),0)
> > +ifeq ($(shell test $(GCC_VERSION) -ge 46 && echo 1), 1)
> >  CFLAGS_BASE_DRIVER += -Wno-maybe-uninitialized  endif
> > CFLAGS_BASE_DRIVER += -Wno-strict-prototypes
> 
> Does this mean that less compiler checking is done or more?

With higher version of compilers more compiler checking is done, for older 
compilers less checking is done. As some of the older compiles do not have 
newly added checking capabilities. Testing with latest compilers ensures we do 
lot more checking.

Thanks!
-Rasesh

> It seems lots of drivers make the excuse:
>  "the base driver comes from another group and is known buggy but can't be
> fixed"
> That doesn't reflect well on the quality of the DPDK.

Reply via email to